§ 2.5.2. Conservation Service Runoff Curve Numbers  


Latest version.
  • The National Resources Conservation Service has developed an index, the runoff curve number, to represent the combined hydrologic effect of soil type, land use, agricultural land treatment class, hydrologic condition, and antecedent soil moisture. These watershed factors have the most significant impact in estimating the volume of runoff, and can be assessed from soil surveys, site investigations and land use maps.

    The curve number is an indication of the potential runoff for a given antecedent soil moisture condition, and it ranges in value from zero to 100. The National Resources Conservation Service runoff curve numbers are grouped into three (3) antecedent soil moisture conditions — Antecedent Runoff Condition (ARC) I, ARC Il and ARC III. Values of runoff curve numbers for all three (3) conditions may be computed following guidelines in Part 630, Chapter 10 of the National Engineering Handbook . ARC I is the dry soil condition and ARC III is the wet soil condition. ARC II is normally considered to be the average condition. The Antecedent Runoff Condition (ARC) was previously referred to as the Antecedent Moisture Condition (AMC) in older NRCS publications.

    However, studies of hydrologic data indicate that ARC II is not necessarily representative of the average condition throughout Texas. Instead, investigations have shown that the average condition ranges from ARC I in west Texas to between ARC II and ARC III in east Texas. The NRCS curve number values provided in Table 2-7 are for an ARC II. If it is desired to change to an ARC I or Ill condition, the adjustments given in Part 630, Chapter 10 of the National Engineering Handbook should be used. Justification must be provided for the selection of an ARC other than condition II.

    The National Resources Conservation Service has classified more than 4,000 soils into four (4) hydrologic groups, identified by the letters A, B, C, and D, to represent watershed characteristics.

    Group A: (Low runoff potential). Soils having a high infiltration rate even when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of deep, well-drained to excessively drained sands or gravels.

    Group B: Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well-drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse texture.

    Group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water or soil with moderately fine to fine texture.

    Group D: (High runoff potential). Soils having a very slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface and shallow soils over nearly impervious material.

    Table 2-7 lists the curve numbers for the four (4) soil groups under various land uses, land treatment and hydrologic conditions. Curve numbers for fully developed conditions should be based on maximum allowable impervious cover listed in Austin zoning and watershed ordinances. When calculating fully developed peak runoff rates it is recommended that the undeveloped curve number and the maximum allowable impervious cover be used as input parameters. In order to determine the soil classifications in the Austin area, the Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil Survey of Travis, Williamson or Hays County, Texas should be used. Digital versions of these soil datasets are available online at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov (accessed 12/18/2012).

    Table 2-7
    NRCS Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas and Agricultural Lands (assuming ARC-II condition)
    Cover Description Curve Numbers for Hydrologic Soil Group
    Cover type and Hydrologic Condition Average % Impervious Area A B C D
    Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established)
    Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.)
    Poor condition (grass cover 50%) 68 79 86 89
    Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%) 49 69 79 84
    Good condition (grass cover 75%) 39 61 74 80
    Impervious areas:
    Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right of way) 98 98 98 98
    Streets and roads:
    Paved; curbs and storms drains (excluding right of way) 98 98 98 98
    Paved; open ditches (including right of way) 83 89 92 93
    Gravel (including right of way) 76 85 89 91
    Dirt (including right of way) 72 82 87 89
    Developing urban areas
    Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation) 77 86 91 94
    Agricultural lands
    Grassland, or range-continuous forage for grazing Poor
    Fair
    Good
    68
    49
    39
    79
    69
    61
    86
    79
    74
    89
    84
    80
    Meadow-continuous grass, protected from grazing and generally mowed for hay 30 58 71 78
    Brush—brush-weed-grass mixture with brush the major element Poor
    Fair
    Good
    48
    35
    30
    67
    56
    48
    77
    70
    65
    83
    77
    73
    Woods—grass combination (orchard or tree farm). Poor
    Fair
    Good
    57
    43
    32
    73
    65
    58
    82
    76
    72
    86
    82
    79
    Woods Poor
    Fair
    Good
    45
    36
    30
    66
    60
    55
    77
    73
    70
    83
    79
    77
    Farmsteads—buildings, lanes, driveways and surrounding lots 59 74 82 86
    1 Poor: less than 50 percent ground cover or heavily grazed with no mulch.
    Fair: 50 to 75 percent ground cover and not heavily grazed.
    Good: greater than 75 percent ground cover and lightly or only occasionally grazed.
    2 Poor: less than 50 percent ground cover.
    Fair: 50 to 75 percent ground cover.
    Good: greater than 75 percent ground cover.
    3 Curve numbers shown were computed for areas with 50 percent woods and 50 percent grass (pasture) cover. Other combinations of conditions may be computed from the curve numbers for woods and pasture.
    4 Poor: Forest litter, small trees and brush are destroyed by heavy grazing or regular burning.
    Fair: Woods are grazed but not burned, and some forest litter covers the soil.
    Good: Woods are protected from grazing, and litter and brush adequately cover the soil.
    Source: National Resources Conservation Service. TR-55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds